Skip to main content, skip to search, or skip to the top of the page.

Code of Student Discipline and MSU Student Policies

  1. Code of Student Discipline

    1. Standing to assert violations

      Any faculty, staff (including examination proctors), or student of the Law College has standing to assert a violation of this Code. Such assertion shall be made to the Dean of the Law College, who shall then proceed as set forth in Section III.

    2. Relationship between this Code and the Bar

      Any violation found to have occurred pursuant to this Code shall be reported to the appropriate State Board of Law Examiners, Character and Fitness Section, whenever admission to a State Bar is sought by a student found to have violated this Code.

    3. Jurisdiction.

      1. Violations subject to discipline under this Code shall include:

        1. Any examination irregularity, whether committed before, during or after an examination, or any act of plagiarism in the submission of a written assignment. Such a finding may be based upon any probative evidence of, but not limited to, the following:
          1. Any conversation with another student during an examination, irrespective of the subject matter of that conversation.
          2. The possession in the examination area of any prohibited material, irrespective of its use.
          3. Any perusal of another student's examination answer, irrespective of the use of such perusal.
          4. Exchanging any examination materials or information with another person.
          5. Use of another person's writings without attribution.
        2. Any act disruptive of the functioning of the College or of any class. Any act respecting the College, its Trustees, faculty, staff or students which would constitute a felony or misdemeanor under Federal, Michigan, or local law;
        3. Any act of deceit, dishonesty, or misrepresentation;
        4. Any unauthorized intentional destruction or defacement of college property or property within the college;
        5. The assertion of a frivolous allegation of impropriety under this Code.

      2. The foregoing shall not be deemed to limit the authority of the faculty and the administration to maintain order and professional decorum in the classroom and throughout the college. Professional decorum shall include avoidance at the college of the public use of epithets and slurs. This rule does not apply to nor prohibit the expression of ideas; an exchange of ideas is encouraged, not discouraged.

      3. The provisions of this Code also extend to conduct which occurs while an MSU College of Law student is enrolled at another institution of higher learning, whether as a visitor at another law school, as a candidate for a joint degree or pursuant to permission to take elective credits in a graduate department at MSU.

    4. Investigation and Determination of Probable Cause

      The Dean, or the Dean's designee, shall have the responsibility for investigating allegations of impropriety. The Dean shall determine whether there is probable cause to believe that a violation has occurred and whether there is probable cause to believe the student against whom the allegation has been made is the violator.

      If the Dean finds probable cause, he/she shall meet with the student and offer a proposed sanction, which, if accepted by the student, will result in no further proceedings under this Code. If no resolution is reached at this stage, then the procedures under this Code shall continue.

    5. Hearing

      1. The student shall be presented with written notice of the allegations of impropriety and notice of a proposed meeting date for selection of the Hearing Panel.
      2. The Dean shall appoint a representative who shall present the case on behalf of the College.
      3. The student may appoint a representative to present the case on behalf of the student.
      4. The Hearing Panel shall be selected as follows: the pool for the Hearing Panel shall consist of the full-time Faculty excluding any faculty member who is a complainant or a witness in the matter. Six names shall be drawn from the pool by blind draw. The student may then strike any three names from the six selected. The three remaining shall be the Hearing Panel. The Panel shall choose from among themselves a Chair who shall be responsible for the conduct of the hearing including determination of questions of procedure and introduction of evidence.
      5. The Hearing shall be scheduled within a reasonable time. Extensions of time may be granted for good cause.
      6. Each side shall provide to the other a list of all witnesses it intends to call and a copy of all written evidence it intends to introduce.
      7. The student is entitled to be present during the testimony of witnesses.
      8. The opportunity for examination of witnesses shall be afforded.
      9. The Hearing shall be recorded by means of electronic audio recording. This audio recording shall be retained and kept with the student's Law College record. Either side may have the proceedings stenographically recorded at his/her own expense.
      10. The strict rules of evidence shall not apply. The Chair may permit the introduction of any relevant evidence bearing upon the issues which is not inherently untrustworthy.
      11. The student is not required to testify at the hearing; however, the Hearing Panel may draw an unfavorable inference from the failure to testify.
      12. The College shall have the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that a violation has occurred and that the student committed the violation.

    6. Argument and Decision

      After submission of all of the evidence, the Dean's representative shall make a final argument, which shall address itself both to the substantive issues and to the question of the appropriate sanction should the Hearing Panel find that a violation has occurred. The student or student's representative will be given a like opportunity to argue to the Panel. The Dean's representative may make a second argument limited to matters of rebuttal. When the arguments are concluded, the Hearing panel shall deliberate in private and make written findings on the issues. If a finding is made that a violation has been proven, the Panel shall impose an appropriate sanction. The findings and decision of the hearing Panel shall be forwarded to the Dean and to the student. The decision of the Hearing Panel is final.

    7. Recognition and Enforcement of MSU Student Discipline

      Any disciplinary action taken by Michigan State University against an MSU College of Law student will be recognized and enforced by the Law College.

    8. Effect of Withdrawal

      If a student withdraws during an investigation, the proceedings are terminated and the student's record annotated.

      Academic violations are investigated by the Associate Dean of Academic Affairs and non-academic violations are investigated by the Associate Dean for Student Affairs.

    Violations of the Code of Student Discipline are reported to the character and fitness section of the state bar.

  2. Spartan Life/MSU Student Handbook

    MSU College of Law students are also expected to adhere to the MSU policies and procedures listed in the MSU Student Handbook and Resource Guide (Spartan Life).

Skip to main content, skip to search, or skip to the top of the page.