Skip to main content, skip to search, or skip to the top of the page.
Professor Ravitch's career has included experience in private practice and on Capitol Hill. Since joining Michigan State University's Law College he has authored several books, and a number of law review articles, essays, book reviews, and book chapters, as well as amicus briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court. He is the author of Marketing Creation: The Law and Intelligent Design (Cambridge University Press 2012), Masters of Illusion: The Supreme Court and the Religion Clauses (NYU Press 2007); Law and Religion, A Reader: Cases, concepts, and Theory (West 2004) (3rd edition due 2015), School Prayer and Discrimination: The Civil Rights of Religious Minorities and Dissenters (Northeastern University Press, 1999 & paperback edition 2001); and Employment Discrimination Law (Prentice Hall, 2005) (with Pamela Sumners and Janis McDonald).
Currently, Professor Ravitch is working on a treatise, Religion and the State in American Law with Scott Idelman and the late Boris Bittker (Cambridge University Press expected 2015). This project is supported by a generous grant from the Lilly Endowment. Professor Ravitch's articles, which have appeared in a number of highly regarded journals, have primarily focused on law and religion, but he has also written about civil rights law and disability discrimination.
In 2001, he was named a Fulbright scholar and served on the law faculty at Doshisha University (Japan), where he taught courses relating to U.S. constitutional law and law and religion. He serves on a Fulbright Review Committee under the auspices of the Council for the International Exchange of Scholars. Complementing his professional service is his commitment to community service; Professor Ravitch has made dozens of public presentations explaining the law before school groups, community groups, and service clubs and has served as an expert commentator for print and broadcast media.
He teaches Constitutional Law, Law and Religion, Torts I, and Law and Interpretation. His current research projects include work on the treatise mentioned above, and an article explaining how the Supreme Court's recent decision in Hobby Lobby harms the Free Exercise of Religion for traditional religious entities. He speaks English, Japanese and Hebrew.
LL.M. with distinction 1994, Georgetown University Law Center; J.D. 1991, The Dickinson School of Law; B.A. 1987, Tulane University
U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania
Marketing Creation: The Law and Intelligent Design (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).
Masters of Illusion: The Supreme Court and the Religion Clauses (NYU Press 2007).
Law and Religion, A Reader: Concepts, Cases, and Theory (Thomson/West 2004) & TEACHERS MANUAL. Second Edition & Teachers Manual (2008). Third Edition in Progress, expected Spring 2015.
Religion and the State in American Law (Cambridge Univ. Press, expected 2015) (with the late Boris Bittker & Scott Idelman). This project is supported by a substantial grant from the Lilly Endowment.
Employment Discrimination Law (Prentice Hall 2005) (with Pamela Sumners & Janis McDonald).
School Prayer and Discrimination: the Civil Rights of Religious Minorities and Dissenters (Northeastern University Press 1999, paperback edition 2001).
Philosophical Hermeneutics in the Age of Pixels: Hans-Georg Gadamer, Peter Tiersma,and Dasein in the Age of the Internet, in Speaking of Language and Law: Conversations on the Work of Peter Tiersma (Oxford Univ. Press, forthcoming 2015).
Religion, Neutrality, and Liberty: Epistemology and Judicial Interpretation, in The Rule of law and the Rule of God (Palgrave MacMillan, Simeon Ilesanmi ed., 2014).
Religion and the Law in American History, in The Columbia Guide to Religion in American History (Paul Harvey & Edward Blum, eds., Columbia Univ. Press, 2012).
Judicial Interpretation, Neutrality, and the U.S. Bill of Rights, in Freedom of Religion Under Bills of Rights (Paul Babie & Neville Rochow, eds. Univ. of Adelaide Press 2012).
Interpreting Scripture/Interpreting Law, in Hermeneutics and the Authority of Scripture (Alan Cadwallader, ed., ATF Press 2011).
Law, Religion and Science– Determining the Role Religion Plays in Shaping Scientific Inquiry in Constitutional Democracies– The Case of Intelligent Design, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law and Social Order (Addleton Academic Publishers 2011).
Legal Horizons: Philosophical Hermeneutics in Law Scholarship and Teaching, in Matters of Interpretation II (Michael J. Nakkula and Sharon M. Ravitch, eds., forthcoming 2012).
Michigan Constitutional Law, in Essays in Michigan Legal History (Paul Finkelman ∓ Martin Hershock, eds., Ohio Univ. Press 2006) (This book received an award from the Historical Society of Michigan).
School Prayer and Discrimination, in The Encyclopedia of Religious Freedom (Catharine Cookson, Derek Davis, Satvinder Juss, eds., Berkshire/Routledge 2003).
A Crack In The Wall: Pluralism, Prayer and Pain in the Public Schools, in Law and Religion: a Critical Anthology (Stephen Feldman ed., NYU Press 2000).
The Shinto Shrine Cases, Religion, Culture or Both: The Japanese Supreme Court and One Hundred Years of Establishment of Religion Cases, 2013 Brigham Young University Law Review 505 (Symposium 2013).
The Unbearable Lightness of Free Exercise Under Smith: Exemptions, Dasein, and the More Nuanced Approach of the Japanese Supreme Court, 44 Texas Tech Law Review 259 (2011) (Symposium).
Playing the Proof Game: The Law and Intelligent Design, 113 Penn State Law Review 841 (2009).
Religious Objects as Legal Subjects, 40 Wake Forest Law Review 1011 (2005).
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Neutrality: Broad Principles, Formalism, and the Establishment Clause, 38 Georgia Law Review 489 (2004).
The Supreme Court’s Rhetorical Hostility: What is “Hostile” to Religion Under the Establishment Clause? 2004 Brigham Young University Law Review 1031 (2004) (symposium).
Locke v. Davey and the Lose-lose Scenario: What Locke Could Have Said, but Didn’t, 40 Tulsa Law Review (2005) (symposium).
Some Thoughts on Religion, Abstinence Only, and Sex Education in the Public Schools, 26 Children’s Legal Rts. J. 48 (2006) (symposium based on presentations for the AALS Section on Education Law panel at the 2006 AALS Annual Meeting).
Struggling With Text And Context: A Hermeneutic Approach to Interpreting and Realizing Law School Missions, 74 St. John’s Law Review 731 (2000) (symposium).
The Americans With Certain Disabilities Act: Title I Of The ADA And The Supreme Court’s Result Oriented Jurisprudence, 77 Denver University Law Review 119 (2000)(with M. Freeman).
Privatization and Public Employee Pension Rights: Treading in Unexplored Territory, 19 Review of Public Pers. Administration 41 (1999)(with W. Lawther).
Creating Chaos In The Name of Consistency: Affirmative Action And The Odd Legacy Of Adarand Constructors Inc. v. Pena, 101 Dickinson Law Review 281 (1997).
Hostile Work Environment And The Objective Reasonableness Conundrum: Deriving A Workable Framework From Tort Law For Addressing Knowing Harassment of Hypersensitive Employees, 36 Boston College Law Review 257 (1995).
Contextualizing Gender Harassment: Providing An Analytical Framework For An Emerging Concept In Discrimination Law, 1995 Detroit College of Law at Michigan State Law Review 853 (lead article in annual labor law issue).
Beyond Reasonable Accommodation: The Availability And Structure Of A Cause Of Action For Workplace Harassment Under The Americans With Disabilities Act, 15 Cardozo Law Review 1475 (1994).
Balancing Fundamental Disability Policies: The Relationship Between The Americans With Disabilities Act And Social Security Disability, 1 Georgetown Journal on Fighting Poverty 240 (1994).
Visits by the Japanese Prime Minister’s to the Yasukuni Shrine Analyzed Under Articles 20 and 89 of the Japanese Constitution, Michigan State University International L. Rev. 713 (Symposium 2014)
A Basic Introduction to Constitutional Free Exercise of Religion in the United States and Japan, 64 Doshisha L. Rev. 85 (2014) (special symposium issue dedicated to Taisuke Kamata).
Legal Interpretation/Scriptual Interpretation, 2009 Michigan State L. Rev. 377 (2010) (symposium).
Religious Freedom and Israeli Law, 57 Drake Law Review 879 (2009) (symposium sponsored by the Drake Constitutional Law Center).
Rights and the Religion Clauses, 3 Duke J. of Constitutional Law & Public Policy 91 (2008).
Intelligent Design in Public Universities: Establishment of Religion or Academic Freedom? 16 William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 1061 (2008) (symposium).
I have also written, or am in the process of writing, a number of short entries for a variety of legal encyclopedias, including: The Encyclopedia of Civil Liberties; Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court of the United States; Encyclopedia of the First Amendment.
Review of Holy Writ: Interpreting Law and Religion (Arie-Jan Kwak, ed., Ashgate Publishing 2009), in International J. for the Semiotics of Law (forthcoming 2011).
Review of Joan Delfattore, The Fourth R: Conflicts Over Religion in America’s Public Schools (2004), 67 Sociology of Religion 112 (2006).
Review of Piety, Politics, and Pluralism: Religion, the Courts, and the 2000 Election (Mary C. Segers, ed. 2002), 65 Sociology of Religion 425 (2004).
Review of Guyora Binder and Robert Weisberg, Literary Criticisms of Law (Princeton Univ. Press 2000), 18 International J. for the Semiotics of Law (2004).
Can an Old Dog Learn New Tricks? A Nonfoundationalist Analysis of Richard A. Posner’s, THE PROBLEMATICS OF MORAL AND LEGAL THEORY, 37 TULSA LAW REVIEW 967 (2002) (invited by the Law Review for Legal Scholarship Symposium issue dedicated to Morton Horwitz).
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
Brief Amicus Curiae in support of Pet. for Writ of Cert. in Hecker v. Deere (2009).
Brief Amicus Curiae of (twenty railway unions) in Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Sorrell (2006).
Chandler v. Siegelman, author of brief Amicus Curiae of the Interfaith Alliance & Horace Mann League in Support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari (filed January 21, 2000). Result: Certiorari granted, judgement vacated and remanded to Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Santa Fe Indep. School Dist. v. Doe. McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky, signed onto "scholars and historians" amicus brief (filed 2004).
Newdow v. United States, signed onto "scholars and historians" amicus brief (filed February 2004).
Locke v. Davey, signed onto "scholars and historians" amicus brief (filed July 2003).
Skip to main content, skip to search, or skip to the top of the page.